School of Engineering

FV3201 Individual Assignment Brief

Assignment Details

There are 5 questions in this assignment. The marks are showed in square brackets. Answer all the 5 questions.

The questions are based around the guidance of Volume 2 of Approved Document B (ADB) 2019 edition, BS9999, BS7974 and the relevant Published Documents that support BS7974. You can utilise these documents to answer the questions set.

Important notes:
Utilise the correct and most up to date versions of guidance, documents and standards.

When utilising guidance documents/standards you must appropriately reference all clauses, tables etc. utilised and show all calculations/working out performed.

Where word counts for questions are stated you must not exceed these limits.

It is recommended to use figures to help with answering essay questions (these do not count towards word count).

Q1 (Total 25 marks).
A company is planning to build a four storey office building. The ceiling height will be 4m and the premises will be provided with a comprehensive fire alarm and fire detection system (Category L3).

Q1(a).
What are the maximum travel distances recommended for a single direction of escape and more than one direction of escape in the following documents:

ADB. (2 marks)
BS9999. (4 marks)

Q1(b).
According to ADB and BS9999, how many people could be accommodated by:

An 800mm wide exit. (2 marks)
A 1500mm wide exit. (2 marks)

Q1(c).
In 300 words or less, briefly discuss the differences between the results obtained from the two different documents. You should discuss how the approaches adopted by the two documents impact on travel distances and exit width in general for this type of premises. You should also state which approach you would recommend following to the company explaining your reasons for your choice.

(15 marks)

Q2 (Total 15marks).
The standard guidance of ADB recommends that the final exit from a stair should be at least as wide as the stair it serves.

A new assembly and recreation building has been constructed and there is an issue where the installed final exit from one stair is narrower than the stair it serves.

It is well established that the rate at which people flow down a stair is less than the rate of flow on a level passageway of the same width. Some international codes allow exit doors to have a lesser width than the stair (e.g. The NFPA Life Safety Code).

In theory, this should allow for the guidance of ADB to be varied provided that it can be demonstrated that an adequate flow rate can be maintained through a door with a narrower clear width than the stair width.

Q2(a).
Using the following information determine the maximum flow rate through the narrow final exit and compare it with the maximum flow rate down the stair. Is the restriction in final exit acceptable?

The calculations should be based around data from Nelson and Mowrer (See Annex G of PD 7974 Part 6).
Stair width = 1500mm.
Final exit width = 1400mm.
Stair tread dimension = 280mm.
Stair riser dimension = 175mm.
Population density will be less than 0.54 persons/m2.

(12 marks)

Q2(b).
What would be the minimum width of final exit that would not impact on the maximum flow rate down the stair.

(3 marks)

Q3 (Total 25 marks)

Q3(a).
In less than 100 words briefly explain what is meant by RSET and how does this approach vary from the approach in the prescriptive guidance of Approved Document B.

(5 marks)

Q3(b).
RSET comprises a number of different elements. Briefly discuss each of the following four elements and explain how they can be determined.

Detection time. (5 marks)
Alarm time. (5 marks)
Pre-movement time. (5 marks)
Travel time. (5 marks)

Answers on each element (i. to iv.) should be less than 100 words.

Q4 (Total 10 marks)
Using the information provided below, answer the questions on RSET. All calculations should be provided with an explanation/justification for selection of parameters where appropriate.

The building is a single storey open plan warehouse (with a simple layout) used to store building materials (which may include combustible materials).

The building has a comprehensive automatic fire detection and fire alarm system such that in the event of a fire it would be expected to be detected within 45 seconds.

A single stage alarm is utilised with no investigation period.

Fire safety in the premises is well managed and only trained staff are allowed onsite.

The occupant density is very low with less than 20 members of staff within the premises at any one time.

There are no disabled members of staff.

In the event of a fire, the maximum travel distance that someone could have to travel (taking into account the discounting of an exit) is 120m.

Q4(a).
What is the RSET for the warehouse?

(5 marks)

Q4(b).
The owner of the warehouse has decided to add a small mezzanine floor to one side of the premises accessed by an open stair. The travel distance from the furthest point on the mezzanine to the top of the open stair is 20m. Travel down the stair is 10m. Travel from the base of the stair to the final exit (taking into account the discounting of an exit) is 110m.

What is the RSET from the mezzanine?
(3 marks)

Q4(c).

If the premises is provided with a smoke ventilation system such that conditions at ground floor level could be maintained tenable indefinitely, what is the RSET from the Mezzanine?

(2 marks)

Q5 (Total 25 marks).
Answer below 5 sub-questions, using less than 150 words per sub-question.

What is ASET? Discuss the factors which affect its value.

(5 marks)

Explain the term tenability limit.

(5 marks)

Explain tenability based upon zero exposure.

(5 marks)

In cases where occupants could be expected to evacuate through smoke, one tenability limit is visibility. What are the recommended tenability limits for visibility? Why does it vary between small and large enclosures?

(5 marks)

In cases where occupants could be expected to evacuate through smoke another tenability limit is temperature. Discuss why the tenability limit for temperature in this case is often taken as 60°C.

(5 marks)

Presentation Instructions

It is your responsibility to ensure that your work is neatly and accurately presented.

The work must be:
Word-processed.
Single sided.
1.5 or double line spaced.
Ariel 12 point font.
Justified.
Page numbered.
On A4 paper.
Margins left and right 3cm.
Attached to a cover sheet.

Marks may be deducted for failure to follow these instructions. Please look at the Student Guide to Assessment for more information.

Referencing

All academic writing must be referenced. If you use other people’s ideas without referencing them you are plagiarising their work.

Either:

Use the Harvard system of referencing within your text. This will take the form: surname, year of publication, page number, and is enclosed within brackets, for example (Bradley 1998, 277). At the end of your essay you should provide an alphabetical list of all the works you cite.

Or:

Use the Numeric System of referencing within your text. At every point in the text where a reference is made, insert a number (in brackets or superscript) and then list the references numerically at the end of your work.

Plagiarism

The use of work produced for another purpose by you, working alone or with others, must be acknowledged.

Copying from the works of another person (including Internet sources) constitutes plagiarism, which is an offence within the University’s regulations. Brief quotations from the published or unpublished works of another person, suitably attributed, are acceptable. You must always use your own words except when using properly referenced quotations.

You are advised when taking notes from books or other sources to make notes in your own words, in a selective and critical way.

Submission

Your work must be submitted with a front cover sheet (detailing the module code and title, essay title, student name and reference number, word count, date submitted).

The assignment should be submitted electronically before 4.00pm on the given date via Turnitin (a guide to submitting work via Turnitin can be found on Blackboard).

The deadline for submission is Tuesday 12th January 2021.

Every attempt will be made to ensure that the work will be marked and available for collection by Wednesday 3rd February 2021.

The individual work is worth 50% of the total module assessment.

Learning outcomes
This assessment will test your ability to meet the learning outcomes as described in your module booklet, specifically:

Demonstrate critical thinking and problem solving
Exhibit creativity and innovation in technical design
Critically review and analyse client and user requirements, technical briefs and apply significant knowledge to design scenarios, including relevant technological, engineering, legal, health and safety and development factors

Assessment Criteria

For more information please see the marking guide at Appendix 1.
Appendix 1
Marking Scheme

Academic Level 6

Classification Grade Relevance Knowledge Analysis Argument & Structure Originality Presentation
20% 20% 15% 20% 15% 10%
Outstanding 70 – 100% Directly relevant to title. Able to address the implications, assumptions and nuances of the title.

Relevance to practice is thoroughly and explicitly addressed. Makes effective use of a comprehensive range of theory and practice knowledge.

Demonstrates ability in the manipulation and transfer of subject material to demonstrate a solid understanding of the issues in both theory and practice. A comprehensive analysis of the material resulting in clear and illuminating conclusions. Coherent and logically structured, making creative use of an appropriate mode of argument and/or theoretical model.

Distinctive work showing independent thought and critical engagement with alternative views. A very well written answer with standard spelling and syntax.

Style is lucid and resourceful with an appropriate bibliographical apparatus.
Above average 60-69% Directly relevant to title.

Is able to demonstrate effective practice relevance. Makes effective use of good theory and practice knowledge.

Manipulates and transfers some material to demonstrate a clear grasp of the themes, questions and issues in theory and practice. Good analysis of the material resulting in clear and logical conclusions. Generally coherent and logically constructed.

Uses an appropriate mode of argument or theoretical model. Contains some distinctive or independent thinking.

Beginning to formulate an independent position Well written with standard spelling and syntax.

Style is lucid utilising an appropriate format and bibliographical apparatus.
Average 50-59% Generally addresses the title, sometimes addresses irrelevant issues.

Relevance to practice effectively addressed, may be implicit in places. Adequate knowledge of a fair range of relevant theoretical and practice related material with evidence of an appreciation of its significance. Adequate analytical treatment, with occasional descriptive or narrative passages which lack clear analytical purpose.

Conclusions are clear. Adequate attempt to construct a coherent argument, but may suffer loss of focus and consistency.

Issues at stake may lack clarity or theoretical models couched in simplistic terms. Sound work which expresses a personal position, often in broad terms and tends towards uncritical conformity to one or more standard views of the topic.

Competently written with only minor lapses from standard spelling and syntax.

Style is readable with acceptable format and bibliographical status.
Below Average 41-49% Some degree of irrelevance to the title.

Superficial consideration of the issues.

Relevance to practice tends towards superficiality and is largely implicit. Adequate knowledge of a limited range of relevant theoretical and practice related material with intermittent evidence of an appreciation of its significance. Evidence of analytical ability.

Intermittent passages of descriptive or narrative material which lack clear analytical purpose.

Conclusions are not always clear and logical. Some attempt to construct an argument is evident but it lacks sufficient clarity and coherence.

Issues at stake are only vaguely stated. Largely derivative.

Attempts to present a personal view, but only in broad terms.

Is largely uncritical and conforms to one or more standard views. Generally competent writing although intermittent lapses from standard syntax and spelling and pose occasional obstacles for the reader.

Format and bibliography is generally error free and acceptable.
Bare Pass 40% Some degree of irrelevance to the title is common.

Only the most obvious issues are addressed at a superficial level and in unchallenging terms.

Relevance to practice is superficially addressed and rarely made explicit Basic understanding of a limited range of relevant theoretical and practice related material.

Largely descriptive or narrative in style with limited evidence of analytical capability.

Conclusions are not always clear or logical

.

A basic argument is evident but tends to be supported by assertion and lacks proper development.

Coherence and clarity are evident only intermittently Largely derivative.

No personal view is adequately formulated

Wholly uncritical and conforming to one or more standard views. Style of presentation makes reading difficult.

Deficiencies in spelling, syntax, format or bibliographical apparatus impact significantly upon clarity.
Fail 0-39% Relevance to the title is intermittent or missing.

The topic is reduced to its vaguest and least challenging terms.

Relevance to practice is barely considered or not at all. A limited understanding of a narrow range of relevant theoretical and practice related material or a lack of basic knowledge in either or both theory and practice necessary for an understanding of the topic
Heavy dependence on description and/or narrative.

Paraphrase is common.

Evidence of analysis is lacking.

Clear and logical conclusions are sparse Little evidence of coherent argument.

There is a lack of development and the work may be repetitive and/or thin. Almost wholly derivative.

The writer’s contribution rarely goes beyond simplifying paraphrase.

No evidence of personal thought. Poorly written with numerous deficiencies in syntax, spelling, expression and presentation.

The writer may achieve clarity (if at all) only by using simplistic or repetitious style.