Identify the dilemma that makes moral choice and action difficult in this instance, as delineated by the essays (or film)
What are the “positions” on the issue as portrayed by the essays that we’ve read (what is the argument/point made by each author, are they just trying to elucidate the facts of the matter, are they arguing for a policy or moral position, etc.)
What do they bring to the table as evidence?
What philosophical school virtue ethics, natural law, consequentialist, deontological might  analyze this dilemma best, and/or does it mix approaches?