Analytical/Interpretative/Reflective Paper Assignment on human nature:

paper you are to highlight the adequacy conditions for claims about “human nature” these philosophers have made. You are, then, to provide your analysis of the plausibility of such conditions and the reasons why the truth claims with the relevant conditions may or may not provide an adequate understanding of what it means to be human. Finally, using a phenomenological hermeneutic address the question,

“What is it like to live one’s life as a human being?” Is this normatively and, in particular, ethically significant? If so, what does it mean for a good human being to live a good or happy life?