Analyze the features of the no-fault liability scheme and discuss how it benefits or disadvantages a person who has suffered from a personal injury.

1. Choose one no-fault liability scheme in a South Pacific jurisdiction. Critically analOthe features. of the no-fault liability scheme’ and discuss how it benefits, or disadvant16 a • person wilo has suffered from a personal injury.
2. Should the tort of harassment be introduced in South Pacific jurisdictions? Critically discuss your answer using comparisons with other common law jurisdiction.
3. To be found liable for an intentional tort, a claimant most prove the element of intention. Using case law, critically analyse and discuss how the courts have expanded the concept of intention to include recklessness.
4. There are limited circumstances where a medical practitioner may undertake medical treatment or procedure without the patient’s consent. Using case law, demonstrate the extent of these circumstances in relation to battery and critically analyse the rationale of
the courts’ decision.
1. Analyze your national legal position (via case law) on whether the existence of statutory
powers can create a common law duty of care?