Description

The assignment must be a minimum of 4 pages of original discussion and analysis, not counting the title page, reference page, figures, tables, and appendixes. The statements in the Case Study must be supported by at least 1 scholarly reference published in or after 2016, cited throughout the narrative and placed on the reference list in the APA format..

• Graduate-level analysis and discussion of case study scenarios requires good narrative prose.

• No bulleted or numbered statements

• DO NOT USE quotations

• Organize content under Level 1 headings in 7th Edition APA

• Do not retype the questions.

• Note: The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

In Chapter 2, “Applications: Age Discrimination in a Promotion?” (end of Chapter 2, pages 87-88): answer questions 1 and 2

1) Prepare a written report that presents a convincing disparate treatment claim that Gus had been intentionally discriminated against on the basis of his age. Do not address the claim as one of disparate impact.

2) Present a convincing rebuttal, from the viewpoint of BPIC, to this disparate treatment claim.