This paper is assigned as an exercise in developing an original philosophical response to a problem from our readings. You should maintain a high level of expository rigor (the emphasis of the first paper) as well a clear critical comparison of all relevant views. This paper differs from the first essay, in that you are required to construct an original argument for your own view. Prompt Provide a clear and concise response of the following prompt in a 3-5 page paper (750-1250 words):

(This is a movie) Million Dollar Baby

In Million Dollar Baby, Frankie ultimately complies with Maggie’s request for assistance in ending her life. James Rachels and Bonnie Steinbock disagree about whether the American Medical Association has a legitimate position on the role that physicians may play in providing this kind of assistance.

Explain the central disagreement between their respective position, and then discuss whether you think the means by which Frankie brings about Maggie’s death would be permitted under Steinbock’s understanding of what a doctor is morally allowed to do.

Finally, explain whether (and why) you think Frankie’s actions toward the end of the film are morally permissible, anticipating and addressing at least one significant potential objection to your view.