Instructions: Technology makes vast amounts of information (and misinformation) readily available. The challenge is navigating this sea of information. Our goal for your general science education is to develop your scientific literacy. A critical skill you must develop is the ability to find reputable sources of academically and scientifically credible information. There are many sources of high-quality scientific information on the open web; you just need to learn how to spot them by identifying any “green” or “red” flags.

For this week’s initial post:

First, decide which species you will choose for your Course Project topic. (Only one species!)
Next, select only ONE article from a source of biology information from the open web or the Trefry Library.
Use the name of your article and its source as the title of your initial post. (You cannot use a source that one of your classmates has already used or you will not receive credit.) (e.g., “Bare-nosed Wombat – Australian Museum.”)
1. Evaluate the source by explaining why it is or is not an academically and scientifically credible source of information.

A. Provide a minimum of three pieces of evidence to support your thoughts and state if they are green or red flag examples.

Some evidence to consider are the credibility of the author as a subject matter expert, the quality of the reference sources included in the article or lack thereof, the credibility of the publisher or website, etc. Review the Source Evaluation Cheat Sheet.

Green-Flag evidence example:

Author is a subject-matter expert (e.g., “Dr. Mary Smith holds a Ph.D. in zoology.”)
Red-Flag evidence example:

Author is not a subject-matter expert and does not provide academically and scientifically credible reference sources. (e.g., “John Jones is a freelance writer with a journalism degree and did not include any credible reference sources.”)
B. Based on the evidence you have provided, state if you feel this source is an overall credible source.