– “Study designs and methods need to be summarized and contrasted. Quality of research needs to be detailed, highlighting any bias or issues of rigour”
– “Critically appraise themes and practice. Will it lead to change and what will change bring

How this lit review different from previous.

Each theme should be discussed and compared. Are there new themes?

Show theme is reliable. Is it justified, any other meanings” – this aspect was not addressed in the discussion.

– Since there is a PRISMA diagram and the CASP assessment – provide literature matrix.

-“Outline the strengths and limitations of studies included in the review; identify gaps in the literature that could be the focus of future research; Discuss in depth the potential impact for practice of the review findings; Outline the strengths and limitations of your review and reflect on the process of undertaking a review”.

-“Discuss whether ethical issues were outlined in the reviewed studies, and / or highlight the potential ethical issues relating to study designs and methods in reviewed studies”.

-“•Discus how your review recommendations/findings will be implemented