Analysis part 1 (350 words): How is the legal issue that the judge addresses in paragraphs 47-49 inclusive (beginning with, ‘Section 2(1) of the Forfeiture Act ending with, ‘the motivation of the offender’) applied in this case?

*Note: If you are looking at the case directly from WestLaw, the paragraphs will be referenced as 47 to 49 in the text of the judgment.

Analysis part 2 (350 words): Critically evaluate the importance of the decision in Ninian, taking into account not only its importance to relief from forfeiture, but also the principles of co-ownership more broadly.

I have provided the reading material for analysis use and please focus on answering the above two questions on this case and (Please use additional sources to support this case analysis, including other cases, articles or books)

Please follow the specific marking criteria and the instructions attached

OSCOLA Referencing: It is not required to use footnotes for the bridging coursework. However, you must cite as you write (as you would in an exam). You are required to submit a bibliography (in alphabetical order (by surname). The bibliography should include all sources cited directly in your work. The bibliography should not include a list sources you have only referred to in your research and preparation.