Answer the following questions:

1. Do you believe Victims of Crimes should be allowed to address the Court? Why? When do you believe it is best to allow them to speak?

2. The law recognizes certain defenses to crime. In those cases, even when an individual has committed the guilty act (actus reus) of an offense, they are not guilty of the crime charged. Why shouldn’t those who commit the guilty act always be held accountable for their actions?

3. Explain the importance of the adversary system. What safeguards are provided by the adversary system?

4. Should prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause?

5. What are the differences between state high courts that have intermediate courts of appeals and those that do not? Why would a state not have an intermediate court of appeals? Is there a difference in the likelihood of an appeal being heard?