2. Personnel: Project Director and Collaborations
A brief description of who will direct the project, including a resume of his/her skills
and experience. List the names and contacts of community groups collaborating
with you on the project. Provide a detailed description of the unique role and
contributions of these collaborators on your project. The number of collaborations is
not limited. Letters of support from your collaborators that specifically outline how you
will work together are required.
Peer Review Criteria for Personnel Section:
• Who will direct the project?
• Is there a resume for the project director in Appendices?
• Who are the names and contacts of community collaborators for the project?
• What are the roles of the community collaborators?
• Are there letters of support from the community collaborators?
3. Management Plan
A description of your key activities plus timeline of key activities. Assign personnel
and deadlines to activities. Activities must be linked to Project Objectives. Project
activities must conclude by May 1, 2025, and a final evaluation report must be
submitted to the XYZ Foundation by June 30, 2025.
Peer Review Criteria for Management Plan Section:
• Are the project tasks clear and valid for the project?
• Are personnel assigned to tasks?
• Are deadlines indicated?
• Are there any goals/objectives that are not addressed by the management
plan?
• Are there any personnel not assigned to tasks?
4. Project Evaluation
A description of your project measurement processes. Describe how you will meet
the objectives listed in the Project Approach and Activities section of your
application. Describe how you will measure the effectiveness of the proposed
strategies, the effectiveness of your collaborations, and the sustainability of your
program once XYZ funds have ended. Describe how you will report the status of your
project to XYZ each year.
Peer Review Criteria for Project Evaluation Section:
• How will the project’s effectiveness and outcomes be measured?
• Are all goals/objectives linked to an evaluation measure?
• How is quality of life being measured?
• How and when will project status be reported to the XYZ Foundation?
5. Budget
A detailed, line-item budget and justification of the funding amount requested. Budget
expenses must be broken up by Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3. You must provide details on
direct and indirect costs and in-kind contributions for this project. Applications that do
not have an accurate, complete budget will not be funded.
Peer Review Criteria for Budget Section:
• Does the project itemize both requested funds and in-kind contributions?
• Do the total requested funds not exceed $300,000?
• Do the requested funds not exceed $100,000 per year?
• Is the budget understandable and accurate?
• Does the budget account for personnel and other direct costs?
• Is the Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) listed for each personnel in both budget
narrative and budget table?
• Does the project list indirect costs?
• Does the budget list a percentage for the indirect rate (%)?
• Is the budget accurate
• Is the budget complete?
6. Appendices (10 points)
Include at minimum the following pieces of documentation: resume of the Project
Director, at least three letters of support from various stakeholders (consumers,
professionals, etc.) supporting your project, and at least one budget table. Include any
supplementary documentation that adds to the value of your proposal.
Peer Review Criteria for Appendices Section:
• Is the Project Director’s resume included?
• Are at least three letters of support from collaborators included?
• Is there at least one accurate and complete budget table?
• Is an APA References list included?
• Is supplementary information included?
• Is each appendix cited within the grant narrative?