Critical Analysis: Use the information from the CASP Checklists (including your reflection paragraphs) to write a summary (about 2-3 pages) synthesizing the level of evidence discovered, quality of the findings and applicability to practice. This section should be concise and demonstrate critical thinking about the analysis of the evidence. Be sure to include the strength of the current evidence and the limitations of the current evidence. (From assignment week 4, 5 & 6)
Summary of Expert Evidence such as clinical guidelines-include these if appropriate from organizations and leaders in the field. Examples of sources for this section include the CDC, Healthy People 2020, AHRQ, ANA, AMA, specific nursing groups such as the Oncology Nurses Society (ONS) etc. included above (From assignment week 6)
Recommendations: Apply the evidence, determine and describe logical and feasible recommendations supported by the evidence you have presented in the critical analysis section above. Be specific and define the recommendations in a bulleted list. If you recommend more study is needed be sure to indicate the reasons for taking this position (week 6)

Stakeholders/Change Agents:

Discuss who, or what organizations are concerned with the findings and the recommendations. Who may benefit from the information, including patients, families, health care professionals, insurance carriers and more. Describe how feasible your recommendations are for these identified groups to develop and implement. Focus this section on how to include patient’s preferences and values in the process (week 6)
Summary or Conclusion:

End with a paragraph or two concluding the argument for change based on your evidence as it stands. Describe how health care professionals can advocate for patients and families and the population health using the EBP process.
Format

Headings, organization, and clarity of written material.
Use of proper grammar, correct spelling and careful editing
Accurate APA formatting and references.