Paper details:

Briefly discuss the Hornaday court’s interpretation of the definition of “possession”. In your answer, indicate whether you agree with the court’s analysis – include whether Hornaday followed precedent, or exercised judicial review of legislation defining possession in the sense that the court’s definition is strained and illogical. If the latter, does the court abuse its discretion?
Be sure to organize your answer in proper paragraphs and include a topic sentence. No outside sources are required for this position paper.
Here is the link of the case: https://law.justia.com/cases/washington/supreme-court/1986/50895-0-1.html